We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 27 June 13
US COAL EXPORTS BEATS CHINESE COAL IMPORTS AS THE MOST INFLUENTIAL COAL TRADE - BIMCO
The influence of American coal exports on seaborne transportation has grown significantly over the past decade. In 2002, the US exported 20.1 millio ...
Thursday, 27 June 13
HANDY : USD 12000 FOR SPOT COAL INDO/CHINA AND AROUND USD 13000 INDO/ECI - FEARNLEYS
Handy
Atlantic rates hold well. Continent to Far East is worth more than USD 14k daily whilst USG to Far East pay 23/24k a day. On the route from B ...
Thursday, 27 June 13
DRY BULK CARRIERS DOMINATE NEWBUILDING ORDERS AS SHIP OWNERS ARE ENCOURAGED BY LATEST FREIGHT RATE RALLY - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Newbuilding orders for dry bulk carriers were already high, compared to last year, prior to the latest rally of the Baltic Dry Index (BDI), which ha ...
Tuesday, 25 June 13
CAPESIZE MARKET TO REMAIN BULLISH SAYS ANALYST - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market has been experiencing its long-awaited rally, with the Baltic Dry Index, the industry's benchmark rising to healthier levels fo ...
Tuesday, 25 June 13
NEWCASTLE PORT SHIPPED OUT MORE COAL W-O-W
COALspot.com - Newcastle port in Australia has loaded 3,101,378 tons of coal for the week ended 0700 hours 24 June 2013, Newcastle Port Corp. ...
|
|
|
Showing 4231 to 4235 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- The University of Queensland
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- White Energy Company Limited
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
