We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 01 July 13
12TH CLEAN COAL FORUM INDONESIA 2013
Press Release: Produced by CDMC Events, The 12th Clean Coal Forum Indonesia 2013 will be held on Dec 5-6,2013 in Jakarta, Indonesia. It will generat ...
Monday, 01 July 13
INDIA AND CHINA STILL DOMINATING THE INDONESIAN THERMAL COAL EXPORT MARKET
COALspot.com: Indonesia, the world's largest multi types coal exporter shipped 35.83* million tons of coal in May 2013, 1.40 per cent l ...
Sunday, 30 June 13
YEAR 2014 INDO SUB-BIT COAL SWAPS EXPECTED TO STAY BELOW 2013 LEVEL
COALspot.com – Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swaps (FOB ) for average August 2013 delivery have gained 0.08 percent on a day lost on week ...
Sunday, 30 June 13
CAPESIZE RATES SEEN INCREASING ON HIGH DEMAND - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - The BDI continued to rise and saw a big gain on Friday. BDI increased 14 per cent week ended 28 June 2013, closed at 1171 points driv ...
Friday, 28 June 13
U.S. PRODUCED 1.52 PERCENT LESS COAL WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com – United states the world’s second largest coal producer produced totaled approximately 19.40 million short tons (mmst) of ...
|
|
|
Showing 4226 to 4230 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Australian Coal Association
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- White Energy Company Limited
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- The University of Queensland
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
