We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 05 July 13
THE DRY BULK MARKET IS GOING FROM STRENGTH TO STRENGTH - INTERMODAL
The Capesize sector has been one that has gone through a wild rollercoaster of emotions this past decade, ranging from the exuberance witnessed duri ...
Thursday, 04 July 13
CHALLENGER SIGNS FORMAL EXCLUSIVE MINING AND MARKETING AGREEMENT FOR ABBR PROJECT IN CENTRAL KALIMANTAN
COALspot.com - Challenger Deep Resources Corp., through its subsidiary PT Bestindo Energy has signed the formal exclusive Mining and Marketing agree ...
Thursday, 04 July 13
ASX LISTED QBL TO ACQUIRE INTERESTS IN MOZAMBIQUE COAL EXPLORATION LICENSES
- QBL to acquire interests in two Mozambique exploration licences prospective for coal
- Licenses located in the highly prospective Zambezi basin, ...
Thursday, 04 July 13
HANDY : INDO/CHINA, CHARTERERS RATING AROUND US$ 10,000 - FEARNLEYS AS
Handy
The Feast market firmed slightly up as mid-July cargos entered the market, but charterers seems not in hurry to cover them and looking for ch ...
Wednesday, 03 July 13
NEWCASTLE COAL EXPORTS DIP 24.79 PER CENT WOW
COALspot.com - Newcastle Coal exports fell 24.79% to 2.33 million tons WoW.
Newcastle port in Australia has loaded 2,332,513 tons of coal for the ...
|
|
|
Showing 4221 to 4225 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Parliament of New Zealand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PTC India Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
