We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 19 June 13
NEWCASTLE SHIPPED 16.05 PERCENT LESS COAL W/E 17 JUNE 2013
COALspot.com - Newcastle port in Australia has loaded 2,606,071 tons of coal for the week ended 0700 hours 17 June 2013, Newcastle Port Corp. ...
Sunday, 16 June 13
WEAK DEMAND KEEPS COAL PRICES LOW
COALspot.com - Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swaps (FOB ) for average July 2013 delivery have lost 2.94 percent week on week but gained 0.06 percent ...
Saturday, 15 June 13
S7 AND S8 ROUTES ARE EXPECTED TO BE STEADY NEXT WEEK - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - This week freight movement was fairly firm with news of China is rebuilding iron ore stockpiles, and ease import rules. Cape and Pana ...
Saturday, 15 June 13
SHIPPING CONFIDENCE REACHES HIGHEST LEVEL FOR TWO AND A HALF YEARS - MOORE STEPHENS
Overall confidence levels in the shipping industry rose to their highest level for two and a half years in the three months ended May 2013, accordin ...
Friday, 14 June 13
U.S. COAL PRODUCTION TOTALED APPROXIMATELY 18.20 MILLION SHORT TONS W/E 8 JUNE 2013
COALspot.com – United states the world’s second largest coal producer produced totaled approximately 18.20 million short tons (mmst) of ...
|
|
|
Showing 4241 to 4245 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- The University of Queensland
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
|
| |
| |
|
