We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 24 June 13
INDONESIA COAL SWAP FOR AUGUST 2013 DELIVERY GAINS WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com – Coal prices for immediate supply contracts have started moving up, but prices for next year supply shows a negative trend ...
Sunday, 23 June 13
BDI CROSSED ITS PSYCHOLOGICAL BARRIER THIS WEEK - VISTAAR
COALspot.com : The BDI crossed the psychological barrier of 1000 points after many months and closed at 1,027 points, which were up by 14.11 pct wee ...
Sunday, 23 June 13
SHIP PRICES NOT FOLLOWING FREIGHT MARKET FUNDAMENTALS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Although it's been the case in many occasions in the past, it appears that ship prices haven't been quite following freight market fundamentals, i ...
Friday, 21 June 13
U.S. COAL PRODUCTION INCREASED WEEK ON WEEK, EIA SAYS
COALspot.com – United states the world’s second largest coal producer produced totalled approximately 19.70 million short tons (mmst) of ...
Thursday, 20 June 13
CAPESIZE : FINALLY A SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT IN RATES! - FEARNLEYS A.S
Handy
Atlantic market kept a steady curve from last week. US Gulf positions fetched tick above USD 21k for Cont/Skaw direction, and vessels fixed f ...
|
|
|
Showing 4236 to 4240 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Australian Coal Association
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
|
| |
| |
|