We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 07 November 13
HANDY : INDO/CHINA ROUNDS ARE SEEING BIDS AT AROUND $16K
Handy
In the Atlantic we have seen more activity this week with several fixtures being concluded at firm rates. USG/Feast been reported at 30k and ...
Wednesday, 06 November 13
THE BIGGER SIZE SEGMENTS LOST GROUND WHILE SUPRAS AND HANDIES HELD ON TO THEIR GAINS - INTERMODAL
Chartering (Wet: Stable+ / Dry: Stable- )
A mirror image of the week prior for the Dry Bulk market, as once more the bigger size segments los ...
Wednesday, 06 November 13
WILL NEW ORDERS DRIVE THE MARKET DOWN AGAIN ONCE DELIVERIES COMMENCE
"While there are many concerns on whether the new orders will drive the market down again once deliveries commence, the second half of 2013 has ...
Tuesday, 05 November 13
AUSTRALIA'S NEWCASTLE PORT SEES DROP IN COAL EXPORTS W-W
COALspot.com: In the week ended November 4, Power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland, totaled 2.77 m ...
Monday, 04 November 13
API 8 CFR S.CHINA COAL SWAP FOR Q3' 2014 DELIVERY CLOSED 3.65% HIGHER COMPARED TO Q1' 2014 PRICE
COALspot.com : API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q4 2013 delivery fell 0.24 percept W-W on Friday 1 November 2013. The CFR South China Co ...
|
|
|
Showing 4026 to 4030 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- The University of Queensland
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Australian Coal Association
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- PTC India Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
|
| |
| |
|
