We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 08 November 13
DRY BULK MARKET BOUNCES BACK ON RENEWED DEMAND - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market staged a mild comeback this week, as the industry's benchmark, the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) inched forward step by step and bit b ...
Friday, 08 November 13
US'S OCTOBER COAL PRODUCTION INCREASED BY 1.78% M-M - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, produced approximately 19.3 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Thursday, 07 November 13
FORMOSA PLASTICS SEEKS 80K MT OF 5850 GAR COAL
COALspot.com: Taiwan's Formosa Plastics Group is inviting bids for 80,000 mt of bituminous coal for delivery in Nov - Dec'13 for its Chi ...
Thursday, 07 November 13
INDONESIAN COAL EXPORT VOLUME INCREASED; REVENUE DECREASED
COALspot.com: Indonesia, the 15th largest economy, 4th largest coal producer in the world and world's largest multi grade coal exporter shipp ...
Thursday, 07 November 13
THE ENERGY INDUSTRY'S RISING WATER CHALLENGE - WOOD MACKENZIE
Water poses a variety of business risks for the energy industry, and could play an influential role in shaping the future energy supply mix, accordi ...
|
|
|
Showing 4021 to 4025 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Australian Coal Association
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- The University of Queensland
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- White Energy Company Limited
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
