We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 03 November 13
H2' 2014 INDONESIAN COAL PRICE ( SWAPS) SHOWS POSITIVE TREND
COALspot.com – Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swap (FOB ) for average Q1’2014 delivery gained 0.24 percept week on week on Friday 1 ...
Sunday, 03 November 13
THE CAPE SIZE INDEX FELL 13.61 PCT W-W
COALspot.com: The freight market continued to soften on the cape and panamax sectors , however the supramax and handy size remained fairly firm.
...
Saturday, 02 November 13
DRY BULK SHIPPERS AREN'T CELEBRATING, BUT THEIR SILENCE IS GOLDEN - MARKET REALIST
In October, performance for major dry bulk shipping companies was mixed. Companies like DryShips Inc. (DRYS) had pulled back more than Diana Shippin ...
Friday, 01 November 13
US'S COAL PRODUCTION UP 0.9 PERCENT W-W
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, produced approximately 19.3 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Friday, 01 November 13
DRY BULK MARKET IN FIRST POSITIVE SIGN IN DAYS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Owners of dry bulk carriers are well aware of the rollercoaster ride that has been the market for their vessels over the past few years. This trend ...
|
|
|
Showing 4031 to 4035 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- The University of Queensland
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- PTC India Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Minerals Council of Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
|
| |
| |
|
