We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 31 October 13
HANDY: ACTIVE; PANAMAX: QUIET; CAPESIZE: NO LIGHT
Handy
The handy market had an active week however not directly translated into the rates we´ve seen in the Pacific. We see more coal and baux ...
Wednesday, 30 October 13
INDONESIAN STATE OWNED COAL MINER HAS EXPORTED 7.02 MILLION TONS OF COAL IN 9 MONTHS
COALspot.com : PT. Bukit Asam, Indonesian state owned coal miner has sold 13.24 million tons of coal for the period January - September 2013. Accord ...
Wednesday, 30 October 13
DRY BULK MARKET HAS LOST FURTHER GROUND THIS PAST WEEK - INTERMODAL
Chartering (Wet: Firm+ / Dry: Stable-)
The Dry Bulk market has lost further ground this past week, as de-creased activity in both basins for both C ...
Wednesday, 30 October 13
CAPESIZE: DOWNWARD; SUPRAS AND HANDIES: STABLE - INTERMODAL
The Dry Bulk market has resumed its downward movement, noting another dip for a third week in a row. The larger size segments were responsible for p ...
Tuesday, 29 October 13
NEWCASTLE PORT SHIPPED 12.29 PER CENT MORE COAL W-W
COALspot.com: Power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from Australia's Newcastle port up 12.29 per cent week on week to 3.61 million mt for ...
|
|
|
Showing 4036 to 4040 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Australian Coal Association
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- VISA Power Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
|
| |
| |
|
