We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 13 November 13
THE SOFTENING HAS AFFECTED THE BIGGER SIZE SEGMENTS; SMALLER ONES STILL APPEAR TO BE VERY STABLE - INTERMODAL
After a month and a half of back to back weekly declines, the dry bulk market has finally reversed its negative course. We believe that there should ...
Wednesday, 13 November 13
DRY BULK MARKET HAS REVERSED ITS NEGATIVE COURSE - INTERMODAL
Chartering (Wet: Firm+ / Dry: Stable+ )
The Dry Bulk market has reversed its negative course this past week with rates for Capes making up fo ...
Wednesday, 13 November 13
NEWCASTLE COAL EXPORTS PLUNGE 12.40% IN W/E 10 NOVEMBER FROM THE PRIOR WEEK
COALspot.com: In the week ended November 11, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland, totaled 2.42 ...
Monday, 11 November 13
TAMIL NADU STATE OWNED POWER GENERATOR TO IMPORT 3.7 MMT OF 6000 GAD COAL
COALspot.com - TANGEDCO, Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corporation Ltd, Tamil Nadu state owned power generator & distributor intends ...
Sunday, 10 November 13
PANAMAX COAL FREIGHT RATES REMAIN UNDER PRESSURE; SUPRAMAX BIGGEST GAINER - REDDY
COALspot.com: The freight market was up this week with all indices increased except for Panamax index.
The BDI was up by 56 points closing at 158 ...
|
|
|
Showing 4016 to 4020 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Australian Coal Association
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- MS Steel International - UAE
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|