We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 30 November 13
NTPC STARTED IMPORTING COAL THROUGH NW1 FOR ITS FARAKKA POWER PLANT
COALspot.com: In a pioneering and path breaking operation, the very first consignment of about 69,060 metric tons of imported coal bought by MV HUAY ...
Friday, 29 November 13
DRY BULK MARKET BACK ON HIGHER GROUND - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market is strengthening as a result of higher demand for Capesize vessels. The BDI (Baltic Dry Index) was up by 146 points yesterday, e ...
Wednesday, 27 November 13
DRY SEGMENTS EXCEPTION OF PANAMAXES, REMAINED OVERALL STABLE - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com : The Dry Bulk market closed off the week in the red, albeit the decrease noted was of short scale. With the exception of Panamaxes, th ...
Wednesday, 27 November 13
US WHEAT IMPORTS TO BRAZIL, REACHED A 35 - YEAR HIGH - EVA TZIMA
COALspot.com: As I am going through a number of dry market fixtures reported since the beginning of October, my eyes instinctively stop where they d ...
Wednesday, 27 November 13
SHIP OWNERS ONCE AGAIN TURN TO DRY BULK CARRIERS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Ship owners once again turned to more dry bulk carrier ordering over the course of the past week, as more and more appear convinced of the industry ...
|
|
|
Showing 3986 to 3990 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- MS Steel International - UAE
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
