We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 04 December 13
INDONESIAN COAL EXPORTS VOLUME AND REVENUE IN OCTOBER MARCHED TOWARDS NORTH
COALspot.com: Indonesia, the world's 4th largest coal producer and the largest multi grade coal exporter shipped over $1.76* billion worth of ...
Wednesday, 04 December 13
WEST AUSTRALIA IRON ORE FIXTURES ALSO CONTINUING TO PROVIDE A STEADY FLOW OF BUSINESS FOR CAPES - INTERMODAL
The Dry Bulk market has reversed course this past week, bringing back some of the lost excitement of the past month, as all size segments climbed hi ...
Wednesday, 04 December 13
THE BUYERS' DEMAND IS CONTINUOUSLY BULLISH - KONSTANTINOS KONTOMICHIS
The very low rates that prevailed for the bigger part of 2013 seem to have prepared the ground for buying opportunities for shipping investors. The ...
Wednesday, 04 December 13
SGX AND CFA TO COLLABORATE TO DEVELOP DERIVATIVES MARKETS IN CHINA AND SINGAPORE
Singapore Exchange (SGX) and the China Futures Association (CFA) are cooperating in the development of derivatives markets in China and Singapore.
...
Wednesday, 04 December 13
SGX'S MONTHLY VOLUMES REACHED A RECORD HIGH OF 705,000 MT IN NOVEMBER 2013
COALspot.com: SGX has announced that, it monthly volumes have reached a record high of 705 lots (705,000 mt) in November 2013 with month-end open in ...
|
|
|
Showing 3976 to 3980 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- White Energy Company Limited
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Australian Coal Association
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- PTC India Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- The University of Queensland
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
