We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 22 November 13
DRY BULK MARKET STILL LACKLUSTRE, DESPITE PROJECTIONS OF A NEW RALLY - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
We might still be about six weeks far from the end of the year, but the projected by many analysts upcoming rally of the dry bulk market, hasn't ye ...
Friday, 22 November 13
US COAL PRODUCTION DOWN 1.3% W-W
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, produced approximately 19.5 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Thursday, 21 November 13
TAIPOWER TO PROCURE 750K MT OF 5500 GAR BITUMINOUS COAL FOR MAY - AUGUST 2014
COALspot.com: Taiwan Power Company intends to procure 750,000 metric tons of bituminous coal with calorific value not lesser than 5,500 kcal/kg on a ...
Thursday, 21 November 13
CAPESIZE : THE DOWNWARD TREND HAS TURNED INTO NOTABLE SPOT AND PERIOD IMPROVEMENT - FEARNLEYS
Handy
The Atlantic market experienced a general rate increase for most trades this week. More cargoes in the market and chrts looking for prompt t ...
Wednesday, 20 November 13
PANAMAX MARKET RESUMED ITS NEGATIVE MOVEMENT FOR A SECOND WEEK IN A ROW - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The recovery noted the week prior in the dry Bulk market proved to be short-lived, as the BDI slipped back down to the low 1,500 point ...
|
|
|
Showing 3996 to 4000 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Planning Commission, India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Australian Coal Association
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- MS Steel International - UAE
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
|
| |
| |
|
