We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 03 December 13
PORT OF NEWCASTLE IN QUEENSLAND SHIPPED 1.22 MMT MORE COAL W-W
COALspot.com: In the week ended December 2, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland, totalled 3.49 ...
Tuesday, 03 December 13
U.S PRODUCED 900.80 MMST YEAR-TO-DATE
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, produced approximately 19.7 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Monday, 02 December 13
SUB-BIT INDONESIA COAL SWAP DIFFERENCE BETWEEN Q1 AND Q3 DELIVERIES ARE VERY MARGINAL
COALspot.com – Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swap (FOB ) for average Q1’ 14 delivery gained $ 1.67 pmt month on month on Friday 29 Novemb ...
Sunday, 01 December 13
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP FOR Q2 AND Q3 DELIVERY SHOWS A DECLINE
COALspot.com : API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q1’ 14 delivery gained 0.63 percept d-d on Friday 29 November 2013. The CFR South ...
Sunday, 01 December 13
PANAMAX RATES HAVE REBOUNDED - CAPT. REDDY
COALspot.com: The freight market was quite firm last week with all the indices increased. Cape Index was gained highest this week which supports inc ...
|
|
|
Showing 3981 to 3985 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Planning Commission, India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
