We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 26 November 13
EWP INVITES COAL BIDS FOR 2014 - 2018 DELIVERIES
COALspot.com: Korea East-West Power Co. Ltd (EWP) invited bids to supply 130,000MT of min 5,600kcal/kg (Sub)-bituminous Coal on NCV basis for March ...
Tuesday, 26 November 13
NEWCASTLE COAL EXPORTS SLIP 22.62% W-W
COALspot.com: In the week ended November 25, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland, totalled 2.26 ...
Monday, 25 November 13
THE SUB-BIT INDONESIA COAL SWAP MOVEMENT IN YEAR 2014 IS STILL FAR FROM PROMISING
COALspot.com – Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swap (FOB ) for average Q1’ 14 delivery gained $ 2.54 pmt month on month on Friday 22 Novemb ...
Sunday, 24 November 13
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS FOR Q4' 14 DELIVERY PRICE SHOWS A NEGATIVE TREND WEEK ON WEEK AND FLAT ON D-D
COALspot.com : API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q1’ 14 delivery gained 0.13 percept d-d on Friday 22 November 2013. The CFR South ...
Sunday, 24 November 13
SUPRAMAX FREIGHT RATES REMAINED FIRM FROM INDONESIA TO INDIA AND CHINA - SOLYM
COALspot.com: The freight market was fairly steady except for the Supramax in SE Asia region which continued to remain firm. The BDI was down by 1.5 ...
|
|
|
Showing 3991 to 3995 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- The University of Queensland
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
|
| |
| |
|