We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 06 December 13
INDONESIAN PARLIAMENT REJECTED A GOVERNMENT PROPOSAL TO EASE THE BAN ON EXPORTING UNPROCESSED ORE
COALspot.com: Indonesian House of Representatives rejected a proposal from Energy and Mineral Resources Minister Jero Wacik on to ease the ban on ex ...
Friday, 06 December 13
THE MINISTRY OF ENERGY & MINERAL RESOURCES OF INDONESIA FIXED DEC'13 HBA AT US$ 80.31
COALspot.com - The Ministry of Energy & Mineral Resources of Indonesia has increased government declared coal bench mark price by US$ 2.18 / MT ...
Friday, 06 December 13
US PRODUCED APPROXIMATELY 82.8 MILLION SHORT TONS OF COAL IN NOVEMBER 2013
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, produced approximately 19.00 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Friday, 06 December 13
PANAMAXES HAVE BEEN THE ' WEAPON OF CHOICE' BY MOST DRY BULK SHIP OWNERS DURING 2013 - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Low ship prices, the direct consequence of subdued freight rates for the larger part of 2013 have been the main driving force behind this year's ag ...
Thursday, 05 December 13
PANAMAX : THE FIRM TENDENCY CONTINUES - FEARNRESEARCH
Handy
It has been an active week for the Supramax and Handysize segment. USG is almost boiling and charterers looking to cover their December stems ...
|
|
|
Showing 3971 to 3975 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- The University of Queensland
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- PTC India Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
|
| |
| |
|
