We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 09 December 13
SUB-BIT INDONESIA COAL SWAP FOR Q3' 14 DELIVERY CLOSED $ 0.57 LESSER THAN Q1 CLOSING
COALspot.com – Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swap (FOB ) for average Q1’ 14 delivery gained $ 1.49 pmt month on month on Friday 6 Decembe ...
Sunday, 08 December 13
SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS SHOW A DECLINE TREND IN Q2 & Q3' 14
COALspot.com : API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q1’ 14 delivery gained 6.76 percept month on month as on Friday 6 December 2013. T ...
Sunday, 08 December 13
RBCT SHIPPED 63.446 MMT OF COALS YTD
COALspot.com - Richards Bay Coal Terminal (RBCT), the world's single largest coal terminal has shipped 63,446,232 mt of coals YTD, according to por ...
Saturday, 07 December 13
SUPRAMAX SHIPS FOR EC INDIA TO CHINA ROUTE BEING FIXED AT AROUND US$ 13K - SOLYM
COALspot.com: The freight market continued to be firm due to high Iron ore demand. The cape index was up by almost 25 pct this week. The grain seaso ...
Saturday, 07 December 13
A RARE TIME IN RECENT SHIPPING MARKET HISTORY: BOTH DRY BULK AND VLCC TANKER EARNINGS ARE ON THE RISE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Around this time of year, back in 2008, i.e. five years ago, the shipping markets were plagued with the aftermath of the global financial crisis tha ...
|
|
|
Showing 3966 to 3970 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Australian Coal Association
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PTC India Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
