We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 11 December 13
BDI REACHED A PEAK OF YEAR RECORD OF 2,237 POINTS WHICH IS A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN MARKET CONDITIONS
Getting closer to the end of 2013, it is important that we have a review of the course the market has taken these past 12 months by looking at the B ...
Tuesday, 10 December 13
HNL, AN INDIAN STATE-OWNED NEWSPRINT PAPER MAKER SEEKS 50K TONS OF INDONESIAN 5600 COAL
COALspot.com: Hindustan Newsprint limited (HNL), an Indian state owned news print paper producer invited bids to supply 50,000MT of min 5,200kcal/kg ...
Tuesday, 10 December 13
COLOMBIAN THERMAL COAL EXPORTS SLIPPED 25.54% M-M IN OCTOBER'13
COALspot.com: Colombia's Thermal coal exports in October dropped 25.54% month on month to 5,990,815.13 million mt, according to data from mining de ...
Tuesday, 10 December 13
NEWCASTLE COAL EXPORTS PLUNGE W-O-W
COALspot.com: In the week ended December 9, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland, totalled 2.50 ...
Monday, 09 December 13
SOUTH AFRICA'S RICHARDS BAY COAL EXPORTS IN NOVEMBER DECLINED 14.43% M-M
COALspot.com: South Africa's Richards Bay coal terminal exported 6.224 million tonnes of coal in November, declining by 1.05 million tons from the ...
|
|
|
Showing 3961 to 3965 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Planning Commission, India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- The University of Queensland
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
