We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 13 December 13
DRY BULK SHIPPING TO WITNESS HEALTHY DEMAND MOVING FORWARD - ICS
The Institute of Chartered Shipbrokers Greek Branch organised its 9th Annual Forum at Eugenides Foundation, on Wednesday, 11th of December, with a r ...
Friday, 13 December 13
US PRODUCED APPROXIMATELY 18.4 MILLION SHORT TONS OF COAL W/E 7 DECEMBER 2013
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, produced approximately 18.4 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Thursday, 12 December 13
GREAT EXPECTATIONS SANCTIONED - EVA TZIMA
News that sanctions on Iranian oil exports could be lifted sometime in the following months have shaken the markets recently. One of the world&rsquo ...
Thursday, 12 December 13
DRY BULK MARKET RATES FOR CAPESIZES TO REMAIN VOLATILE SAYS BIMCO
The dry bulk market has reached multi year highs this week, as the BDI is standing at the 2,300-point mark. In its analysis of the market, BIMCO pre ...
Wednesday, 11 December 13
THE INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT IS CONSIDERING SETTING A REGULATION ON THE MINIMUM PURITY TO REGULATE UNPROCESSED ORE BAN
COALspot.com: Energy and Mineral Resources Minister Jero Wacik recently proposed to house those mining (mineral) companies that had shown a commitme ...
|
|
|
Showing 3956 to 3960 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- The University of Queensland
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- MS Steel International - UAE
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
