We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 17 December 13
NEWCASTLE COAL EXPORTS UP 37.83% WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: In the week ended December 16, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland, totalled 3.45 ...
Monday, 16 December 13
SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP LOST $ 0.53 IN A WEEK
COALspot.com – Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swap (FOB) for average Q1’ 14 delivery gained $ 0.91 pmt month on month on Friday 13 December 2013 ...
Monday, 16 December 13
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL Q3' 14 DELIVERY PRICE CLOSED $1.63 LESSER THAN Q1' 14 PRICE
COALspot.com : API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q1’ 14 delivery gained 5.34 percept month on month as on Friday 13 December 2013. ...
Sunday, 15 December 13
SUPRAMAX'S FREIGHT RALLY COMES TO AN END THIS WEEK
COALspot.com: The BDI was up by 7 pct closing at 2,330 points week on week and the cape index was also up by 10.51 points and closed at 4,246 points ...
Friday, 13 December 13
HARD COAL : VOLUMES POSSIBLY AT RECORD-BREAKING HIGH; PRICES POSSIBLY AT A RECORD-BREAKING LOW - VDKI
Press Release : World Hard Coal Market 2013: volumes possibly at record-breaking high, prices possibly at a record-breaking low. German and UK impor ...
|
|
|
Showing 3951 to 3955 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- PTC India Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Planning Commission, India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
|
| |
| |
|
