We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 04 August 15
SHIPPING CYCLES - A CHESS GAME YOU DON'T WANT TO LOSE - CLARKSONS
Ingmar Bergman’s classic movie The Seventh Seal is about a knight who, during the Black Death, challenges Death to a chess match, in the hope ...
Monday, 03 August 15
NEWCASTLE COAL SWAPS DECLINE FURTHER THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for 4Q’ 2015 delivery down $ 1.92 per MT (-4.22%) month over month to US$ 43.58 per mt. The swap ...
Monday, 03 August 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS SLIDE THIS WEEK
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for 4Q’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 1.64 (3.14%) per MT month over month.
A commodity swap ...
Sunday, 02 August 15
CAPESIZE RATES PUSH BDI UPWARD
COALspot.com: The freight market was buoyant this week as BDI rose 4.14 pct to 1131 points. The cape index was also increased 16.50 pct 2209 points ...
Saturday, 01 August 15
DRY BULK MARKET KEEPS ITS MOMENTUM, AS OUTLOOK IMPROVES - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Although conditions remain more than challenging, especially from an economic point of view (aka China’s stock worries), the dry bulk market ...
|
|
|
Showing 2891 to 2895 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- The University of Queensland
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|