We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 05 August 15
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - KATERINA RESTIS
On July 14th, 2015 a historical consensus was reached in Vienna between Iran and the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council, plus Germ ...
Wednesday, 05 August 15
COAL CONSUMPTION POSTED THE STRONGEST GROWTH AMONG THE FOSSIL ENERGY SOURCES IN 2014 - VDKI
Coal 2014: again the world's fastest-growing primary energy source and an indispensable asset for the success of the energy turnaround.
Ac ...
Wednesday, 05 August 15
FOB INDONESIA THERMAL COAL SWAPS FALL
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery 4Q 2015 declined month on month and week over week, this past week.
The 4Q swap was declined $ ...
Wednesday, 05 August 15
DRY BULKER PRICES START TO FIRM UP AS MARKET SENTIMENT IMPROVES - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Market pessimism in the dry bulk industry, a trend which had established itself over the course of the year, has started to fade away over the past ...
Tuesday, 04 August 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS CONTINUE TO FALL DUE TO SLIDING DEMAND
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery 4Q' 2015 declined month over month and week over week.
The 4Q swap was down US$ ...
|
|
|
Showing 2886 to 2890 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- The University of Queensland
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Australian Coal Association
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- White Energy Company Limited
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
