We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 31 July 15
CAPE'S PAPER MARKET REMAINS FIRM - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The positive sentiment that the Dry Bulk market has been enjoying as of the previous month, was carried through last week as well, bu ...
Friday, 31 July 15
COAL PRODUCTION IN THE U.S. UP 3.6% FOR THE WEEK ENDING JULY 25
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 17.8 million shor ...
Friday, 31 July 15
CHINA'S NEW OIL IMPORT RULES HAVE MINIMAL IMPACT ON STATUS QUO - FITCH
Fitch Ratings says that China's looser criteria for crude oil import rights are a positive but modest step towards encouraging private-sector p ...
Thursday, 30 July 15
EFFECTS OF THE CHINESE STOCK MARKET CRISIS - INTERMODAL
All evidence is currently signaling that the Chinese stock market will be the newest hurdle for the global economy. With the world's second lar ...
Wednesday, 29 July 15
Q1'16 FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP CLOSED HIGHER THAN Q3'15
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery Q3 2015 declined month on month and gains week over week, this past week.
The Q3 swap was decl ...
|
|
|
Showing 2896 to 2900 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- The University of Queensland
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Planning Commission, India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- PTC India Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
|
| |
| |
|
