We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 29 July 15
Q4' 15 FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS DECLINE 4.41% TO $56.52 PMT
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q3' 2015 declined month over month and week over week.
The Q3 swap was down US$ ...
Tuesday, 28 July 15
INDONESIA DELAYS PLAN TO RAISE COAL ROYALTIES AMID PLUNGING PRICE - JP
The government will postpone a plan to increase royalty payments from coal miners as they are already burdened with the commodity’s plunging ...
Tuesday, 28 July 15
API 5 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP LOST M-M AND GAINED W-W
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery down $ 1.15 per MT (-2.51%) month over month to US$ 44.62 per mt. The swap ...
Monday, 27 July 15
KOMIPO INVITES BIDS FOR TOTAL 545,000 MT OF COAL FOR BORYEONG POWER PLANT
COALspot.com: South Korean state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued an new tender to purchase total 545,000 Metric Tons (MT) of coal ...
Monday, 27 July 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP WEAK M/M; FIRM W/W
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 0.92 (1.77%) per MT month over month.
A commodity swap ...
|
|
|
Showing 2901 to 2905 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- PTC India Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
