We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 07 August 15
COAL PRICE DEVELOPMENTS CAN ONLY BE DESCRIBED, SUCCINCTLY AS "OVERSUPPLY MEETS SUBDUED DEMAND" - VDKI
Coal Outlook 2015 – International
Regarding the outlook for global coal trading, two questions arise: firstly, “ whether the years of ...
Friday, 07 August 15
U.S. YEAR-TO-DATE COAL PRODUCTION TOTALED 528.1 MMST; DOWN 8.7% Y/Y - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 17.7 million shor ...
Thursday, 06 August 15
THE RATES FOR CAPES SHOOT UP LAST WEEK; GIVING THIS RECENT RALLY SOME MUCH NEEDED LEGS - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The Dry Bulk market noted another positive closing last week, entirely supported by Capesize performance, which managed to balance th ...
Thursday, 06 August 15
HARD COAL AND COKE IMPORTS TO GERMANY REACH NEW ALL-TIME HIGH OF 56.2M TONES IN 2014
Demand for German and imported hard coal In 2014, in 2014 fell by almost 8%, or 4.8m TCE, to 56.2m TCE.
According to German Coal Importer ...
Thursday, 06 August 15
SEABORNE WORLD TRADE IN STEAM COAL GROWS BY 3% YOY - GERMAN COAL IMPORTER ASSOCIATION
Global trade with hard coal, at 1,272m tones in 2014, increased by 35m tonnes or 3% in comparison with the previous year.
According to associa ...
|
|
|
Showing 2881 to 2885 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Planning Commission, India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- VISA Power Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
|
| |
| |
|
