We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 12 August 15
FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP FLAT WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for 4Q’ 2015 delivery down $ 0.98 per MT (-2.20%) month over month to US$ 43.65 per mt. The swap ...
Tuesday, 11 August 15
GLOBAL PRODUCTION OF CRUDE STEEL REACHED A NEW ALL-TIME HIGH OF 1,661M TONNES IN 2014 - VDKI
COALpot.com: Global production of crude steel reached a new all-time high of 1,661m tonnes in 2014, said German Coal Importer Association, in its l ...
Tuesday, 11 August 15
2016 CFR S.CHINA COAL SWAPS CLOSED SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN 4Q 2015 CLOSING PRICES; BUT NOT SIGNIFICANT
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for 4Q’ 2015 delivery declined just US cents 10 (0.20%) per MT month over month.
A commodi ...
Monday, 10 August 15
SOUTH KOREAN UTILITY KOMIPO INVITES BITUMINOUS COAL BIDS FOR BORYEONG POWER PLANT
COALspot.com: South Korean state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued an new tender for 560,000 Metric Tons (MT) of 4,600kcal/kg NAR c ...
Sunday, 09 August 15
THE PANAMAX MARKET HAS REMAINED WEAK THIS WEEK
COALspot.com: The freight market continued to be buoyant with cape index pushing the BDI.
The BDI was up 10.49% and closed at 1200 points on 7 ...
|
|
|
Showing 2876 to 2880 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- PTC India Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Economic Council, Georgia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Australian Coal Association
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
|
| |
| |
|
