We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the ...
Thursday, 13 August 15
THE RATES FOR CAPES KEPT RALLYING LAST WEEK - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: Strong Capesize performance kept supporting the Dry Bulk market last week, which noted another positive weekly closing, while rates f ...
Thursday, 13 August 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS CONTINUE FALLING
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery 4Q' 2015 declined month over month and week over week.
The 4Q swap was down US$ ...
Wednesday, 12 August 15
DRY BULK MARKET: WITHOUT A DOUBT REACHED HEALTHIER LEVEL
A few weeks before the end of the summer season, the BDI is hovering around 1,200 points, providing some much needed optimism to all Dry Bulk marke ...
Wednesday, 12 August 15
REGULATION CURBS POWER OF LOCAL AUTHORITIES IN MINING SECTOR IN INDONESIA - FLORENCE G. SANTOSO
The Indonesian Government appears to be getting serious about stripping Regents of the authority to issue mining licenses. The Government took the ...
|
|
|
Showing 2871 to 2875 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- The University of Queensland
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Planning Commission, India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- White Energy Company Limited
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Australian Coal Association
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
|
| |
| |
|
