We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 10 August 22
THE FUTURE OF COAL: EIGHT KEY THEMES FROM THE GLOBAL COAL FORUM - WOOD MACKENZIE
Coal investors face a multi-layered and unavoidable challenge: markets distorted by war, trade constraints and the existential threat of the energy ...
Saturday, 06 August 22
SUMITOMO Q1 PROFIT RISES 45% ON STRONGER PRICES OF COAL, NICKEL - REUTERS
Japanese trading house Sumitomo Corp 8053.T said on Wednesday its net profit for the April-June quarter rose 45% to a record thanks to higher price ...
Saturday, 06 August 22
GERMANY'S ENERGY U-TURN: COAL INSTEAD OF GAS - DEUTSCHE WELLE
Berlin has realized it will never again import as much energy from Russia as before the Ukraine war. So the challenge is to wean Germany off its de ...
Saturday, 30 July 22
NUANCES OF FORCE MAJEURE CLAUSE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
Knowledge to Elevate
In NKD Maritime Limited v. Bart Maritime (No 2) Inc (Shagang Giant) [2022] EWHC 1615 (Comm), Bart Maritime (No 2) Inc (th ...
Saturday, 30 July 22
AEMO URGES QUICKER SHIFT TO RENEWABLES AMID COAL FAILURES AND SOARING FOSSIL FUEL COSTS
The Australian Energy Market Operator has called for an accelerated shift to wind and solar, backed up by batteries and other storage, as a devasta ...
|
|
|
Showing 266 to 270 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- PTC India Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- The University of Queensland
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
|
| |
| |
|
