We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 26 July 22
CAP RUSSIA'S OIL PRICE NOW - PROJECT SYNDICATE
Though the price of oil has declined in recent weeks, it is still through the roof, filtering through to gasoline prices, and causing economic and ...
Tuesday, 26 July 22
WILL SOUTH AMERICA’S WINTER DEMAND DRAW LNG CARGOES AWAY FROM EUROPE? - ICIS
South America is now in the middle of its winter demand season. Last year the region increased its share of global LNG imports in winter, with Braz ...
Monday, 25 July 22
GLOBAL 2021 COAL-FIRED ELECTRICITY GENERATION SURGES TO RECORD HIGH - REUTERS
By contrast, mine output was still fractionally below the record set between 2012 and 2014 because older and less efficient coal generators have be ...
Saturday, 23 July 22
THE EU HAS BEEN REDUCING IMPORTS OF RUSSIAN REFINED OIL PRODUCTS SINCE MARCH - BANCHERO COSTA
The European Union could now ban the import and transit of fuel oil from Russia around six months ahead of the planned deadline, an EU official and ...
Saturday, 23 July 22
INDONESIA CONSIDERING SCRAPPING DOMESTIC SALES RULE FOR PALM OIL EXPORTS - REUTERS
Indonesia is considering removing a domestic sales requirement for palm oil exports because high inventories of the vegetable oil have been holding ...
|
|
|
Showing 276 to 280 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Australian Coal Association
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- PTC India Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- The University of Queensland
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
