We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 29 July 22
GLENCORE TO SUPPLY COAL TO NIPPON STEEL AT $375 PER TON - BLOOMBERG
Glencore Plc, agreed to supply coal to Nippon Steel at one of the highest prices ever paid by the Japan Bloomberg reported on July 27.
...
Friday, 29 July 22
GLOBAL COAL DEMAND IS SET TO RETURN TO ITS ALL-TIME HIGH IN 2022 - IEA
The world’s consumption of coal is set to rise slightly in 2022, taking it back to the record level it reached nearly a decade ago, according ...
Thursday, 28 July 22
CREW FAMILIARISATION IS CRITICAL WHEN TAKING OVER A VESSEL - WEST P&I CLUB
Knowledge to Elevate
When a vessel changes ownership and/or manager, it can take some considerable time before the new crew and mana ...
Thursday, 28 July 22
RETURN OF COAL A THREAT TO EUROPEAN COMPANIES' ESG RATINGS - REUTERS
European companies turning to coal as an alternative to Russian gas face a hit to their environmental, social and governance ratings, leaving them ...
Wednesday, 27 July 22
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Amid the upcoming ban on Russian coal from the EU, which will be in full effect on August 10th, EU nations have been accelerating their coal import ...
|
|
|
Showing 271 to 275 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Australian Coal Association
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PTC India Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- MS Steel International - UAE
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
