We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 17 August 22
CHINA'S COAL-RICH SHANXI MAKES STRIDES IN HIGH-QUALITY DEVELOPMENT - XINHUA
Shanxi, a major coal-producing province in north China, has made continuous advances in high-quality development over the past decade, according to ...
Wednesday, 17 August 22
PAXOCEAN, HONG LAM MARINE AND BUREAU VERITAS SIGN MOU TO DEVELOP AMMONIA BUNKER VESSEL DESIGN - BUREAU VERITAS
PaxOcean Engineering Pte. Ltd. has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Singapore-based bunker vessel operator Hong Lam Marine and class ...
Wednesday, 17 August 22
GOODFUELSS ASIA-PACIFIC BRANCH KICKSTARTS SUSTAINABLE BIOFUEL DELIVERIES WITH NYK AS FIRST CLIENT - GOOD FUELS
GoodFuels, the leading biofuels pioneer for the global transport industry, has today announced that it has successfully supplied sustainable marine ...
Tuesday, 16 August 22
EU BAN ON RUSSIAN COAL IMPORTS COMES INTO FORCE - DEUTSCHE WELLE
The European Union banned Russian coal imports in response to the invasion of Ukraine as part of sanctions in April. Since then, it’s been sc ...
Thursday, 11 August 22
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
On July 22nd, Ukraine signed a deal with Russia to release 22mn tons of grain from Ukraine’s 3 major ports (Yuzhny, Chornomorsk, Odesa). Such ...
|
|
|
Showing 261 to 265 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- White Energy Company Limited
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- The University of Queensland
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Australian Coal Association
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
