We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 21 August 22
COAL-RICH POLAND FACES WINTER OF ENERGY DISCONTENT - DW
Poland uses 10 million tons of coal a year to heat households — a whopping 87% of all coal consumed in EU homes in 2019, according to the War ...
Saturday, 20 August 22
KOSPO TO IMPORT 240000 MT OF MIN 4400 KCAL/KG NCV STEAM COAL FOR OCTOBER;LOADING FROM RUSSIAN PORTS NOT ALLOWED
COALspot.com: Korea Southern Power Co., Ltd. (KOSPO) has issued an International tender for 240,000 MT of min 4,400kcal/kg to max. 4,999 kcal/kg NC ...
Wednesday, 17 August 22
INDIAN COMPANIES SWAPPING DOLLAR FOR ASIAN CURRENCIES TO BUY RUSSIAN COAL - REUTERS
Indian companies are using Asian currencies more often to pay for Russian coal imports, according to customs documents and industry sources, avoidi ...
Wednesday, 17 August 22
LNG: MAJOR INVESTMENT AND EXPANSION PHASE, DOUBLING OF LIQUEFACTION CAPACITY BY 2028 PROJECTED - CLARKSONS
Clarksons Research have released the latest version of their long standing annual review, LNG Trade & Transport, on to Shipping Intelligence Ne ...
Wednesday, 17 August 22
UNAFFORDABLE LNG PRICES UNDERMINE RAPID DEMAND GROWTH FORECASTS IN KEY ASIAN MARKETS - IEEFA
Sustained high prices may accelerate downward pressures on Asian LNG demand, clouding long-term industry outlooks
The global liquefi ...
|
|
|
Showing 256 to 260 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- White Energy Company Limited
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Parliament of New Zealand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- The University of Queensland
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- PTC India Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
