We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 12 September 16
THE CAPE MARKET HAS GAINS ON WEEK; THE CAPE INDEX SETTLING AT 1566 POINTS ON FRIDAY
COALspot.com: The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities rose and ending in a positive note this past week. The BD ...
Friday, 09 September 16
U.S. WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT DECLINED SLIGHTLY TO 16.1 MMST, EIA SAYS
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 16.1 million short ton ...
Friday, 09 September 16
CAPESIZE: THE SENTIMENT IS SOLID, SAYS FEARNLEYS
Supramax
A quiet start with Labour Day celebrations in the United States leading to very little being reported from the Atlantic basin. Supramaxe ...
Thursday, 08 September 16
U.S. COAL EXPORTS IN JUNE 2016 UP 29% COMPARED TO MAY 2016, SAYS EIA
U.S. coal production in August was 71 million short tons (MMst), which is 6 MMst (9%) higher than in the previous month and 12 MMst (14%) lower tha ...
Wednesday, 07 September 16
WEEKLY MARKET (TANKER) REPORT - INTERMODAL
What goes around comes around! The Shipping industry is infamous for its seasonality and cyclicality and the tanker sector is no exception to these ...
|
|
|
Showing 2291 to 2295 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- PTC India Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Minerals Council of Australia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- The University of Queensland
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
