We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 15 September 16
INDONESIA MAY FACE A COAL CRISIS BY 2035!
COALspot.com: Indonesia is the world’s fourth-largest coal producer and the world’s largest thermal coal exporter may face a coal crisi ...
Thursday, 15 September 16
CAPESIZE: LAST WEEK ENDED ON A VERY STRONG NOTE MAINLY DRIVEN BY A ACTIVE BRAZIL MARKET - FEARNLYS
Supramax
With holidays in the eastern hemisphere beginning this week, the sentiment and activity level has been decreasing.
In the Pacific, ...
Wednesday, 14 September 16
THE DRY BULK MARKET REACHED LEVELS LAST SEEN BACK IN 2015 - INTERMODAL
In an earlier column we commented that we are undergoing “shipping’s new (ab)normal” with constrained financing, shift in demand ...
Wednesday, 14 September 16
THE PORT OF NEWCASTLE SHIPPED 12.48 MMT OF COAL IN AUGUST; AVERAGE SELLING PRICE WAS $AU 83.33
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading ports and the world’s largest coal export port has shipped $AU $1,040.4 ...
Tuesday, 13 September 16
CAPESIZE: BIG STRENGTH SEEN IN THE MARKET THIS WEEK - ALLIED
Capesize - Big strength seen in the market this week, with an upbeat in sentiment amongst owners helping pull up rates fairly quickly and many hold ...
|
|
|
Showing 2286 to 2290 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Australian Coal Association
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- White Energy Company Limited
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Planning Commission, India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
|
| |
| |
|