We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 02 September 16
EIA FORECASTS U.S. COAL EXPORTS TO DECLINE BY 19 MMST IN 2016 TO 55 MMST
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 16.3 million sho ...
Thursday, 01 September 16
SUPRAMAX GETTING LEVELS OF MID/HIGHER 7K DELIVERY SINGAPORE FOR TRIPS TO CHINA AND AROUND 9K FOR DIRECTION INDIA - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
This week started slower with London on bank holiday Monday. The south east Asian market seems to have been taking a breather with chart ...
Thursday, 01 September 16
AUSTRALIA'S NEWCASTLE PORT SHIPPED 2.33 PERCENT MORE COAL IN JULY
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading ports and the world’s largest coal export port has shipped $AU 1.10 bill ...
Wednesday, 31 August 16
THE DRY BULK MARKET MANAGED TO FIND FURTHER SUPPORT DURING THE LAST DAYS OF THE SUMMER SEASON - INTERMODAL
The Dry Bulk market managed to find further support during the last days of the summer season, with the BDI climbing above 700 last Friday, reachin ...
Tuesday, 30 August 16
THE SUDDEN SURGE IN IRON ORE TRADE HAS CREPT UP ON THE MARKET THIS PAST WEEK - GEORGE LAZARIDIS
The sudden surge in Iron ore trade has crept up on the market this past week bringing about a change in the prospects for Capes. Continued increase ...
|
|
|
Showing 2301 to 2305 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- The University of Queensland
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- PTC India Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
