We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 21 September 16
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - PANOS MAKRINOS
Amidst a challenging dry bulk and tanker market, very little time has been spent on the offshore industry developments during the past couple of ye ...
Monday, 19 September 16
AFTER YEARS OF COMA, COAL BECOMES THE MOST ATTRACTIVE COMMODITY RIGHT NOW
COALspot.com: China boosted coal imports in recent months. The Chinese government’s drive to cut over capacity pushed up the demand for therm ...
Monday, 19 September 16
THE CAPE INDEX WAS UP 7.28% WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities declined and ending in a slightly negative note this past ...
Friday, 16 September 16
GLOBAL SHIPBUILDING: THE CHALLENGE TO REMAIN 'ACTIVE' - CHRISTOPHER PEARCE, CLARKSONS
The number of ‘active’ shipyards globally has more than halved since the start of 2009, falling to around 400 shipyards at the start of ...
Friday, 16 September 16
U.S. WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT DECLINED 6.2% TO 15.1 MMST, SAYS EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 15.1 million short ton ...
|
|
|
Showing 2281 to 2285 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
