We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 06 September 16
INDO GOVT. SETS SEPTEMBER COAL REFERENCE PRICE AT US$ 63.93 PER TON; JUMP 20.17% YTD
COALspot.com: The Indonesia coal benchmark price hits to its highest level since April 2015. The government declared benchmark prices f ...
Tuesday, 06 September 16
CAPESIZE: THE PACIFIC BASIN WAS THE MAIN REGION KEEPING UP WITH THE POSITIVE SUPPORT - ALLIED
Capesize
Despite some mixed feelings being seen early on in the week, we managed to see a positive week-on-week close on Friday with some positiv ...
Monday, 05 September 16
INDIA BECAME ADARO'S SECOND LARGEST MARKET IN 1H' 16
COALspot.com: The Wara Balangan blend product has been well received by customers in China and India - AI
In the second quarter of 2 ...
Monday, 05 September 16
POOR FREIGHT RATES DESPITE STRONG DEMAND GROWTH FROM CHINA - BIMCO
Demand
The dry bulk commodity imports into and exports out of China we have seen in the first half of 2016 are very positive – and nothing ...
Monday, 05 September 16
FREIGHT RATE FROM INDONESIA TO INDIA IS EXPECTED TO BE FLAT TO SOFT THIS WEEK
COALspot.com: The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities rose and ending in a positive note this past week except ...
|
|
|
Showing 2296 to 2300 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Australian Coal Association
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The University of Queensland
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Planning Commission, India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|