We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 23 September 16
"COLLATERAL LIES" DO NOT NECESSARILY UNDERMINE AN INSURANCE CLAIM
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
An insured was not precluded from recovering under an insurance policy even though it had made a false statement during t ...
Friday, 23 September 16
EIA SEES U.S. COAL WEEKLY OUTPUT INCREASE
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 16.1 million short ton ...
Thursday, 22 September 16
CHINA IS THE PRICE-SETTING COUNTRY FOR GLOBAL THERMAL COAL
COALspot.com: China has been the driver of global coal growth since 2009. When China became the largest coal importer in 2011, the country also has ...
Thursday, 22 September 16
SUPRAMAXES ARE ACHIEVING AROUND $7000 FOR A TRIP WITH SINGAPORE DELIVERY VIA INDONESIA TO CHINA
Supramax
A slow start to the week in the Supramax segment in the Atlantic with not much being reported.
In the Blacksea Supramaxes are getti ...
Wednesday, 21 September 16
THE CAPESIZE MARKET HAS BEEN ON A RALLYING TREND SINCE THE END OF AUGUST - GEORGE LAZARIDIS
The Capesize market has been on a rallying trend since the end of August, fuelled mainly by the chase by traders to pre-stock before the typical pi ...
|
|
|
Showing 2276 to 2280 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Australian Coal Association
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
