We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 29 September 16
FREIGHT RATES MIGHT CONTINUE TO SLIDE NEXT WEEK DUE TO HOLIDAYS IN CHINA
Supramax
Flat start to week followed by a slight gain in rates for Supramaxes, says Fearnleys in its latest weekly report.
According to Fear ...
Wednesday, 28 September 16
WITHOUT A DOUBT FREIGHT RATES HAVE MOVED UP A BIT TO HEALTHIER LEVELS - INTERMODAL
As we are approaching Q4, it is interesting to perform a review of the last nine months with respect to the second-hand prices of Supramax and Pana ...
Tuesday, 27 September 16
THE CAPESIZE RATE OF INCREASE HAS BEEN IMPRESSIVE, UP 39% W/W AND 123% MONTH TO DATE - ALLIED
The Dry bulk market has seen a rare shine in its performance as the capesize sector manages to rally at an unprecedented rate compared to its perfo ...
Monday, 26 September 16
COAL PRICES HAVE BEEN MOVING STEADILY HIGHER AFTER YEARS OF DECLINE
COALspot.com: A rally in thermal coal prices over the past few months, after years of decline, is still continuing and it is expected to rally at l ...
Monday, 26 September 16
THE FREIGHT MARKET WAS FIRM; ALL SEGMENTS WERE UP THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities rose and ending in a positive note this past week. The BD ...
|
|
|
Showing 2271 to 2275 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Australian Coal Association
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Planning Commission, India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
