We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 17 October 18
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - TIMOS PAPADIMITRIOU
In the last three months approximately 72 tankers changed hands involving ships larger than 33kdwt up to VLCC. 43 of those vessels had to do ...
Tuesday, 16 October 18
A PRACTICAL OVERVIEW OF THE IMO 2020 SULPHUR CAP - CLYDE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
With less than eighteen months before Regulation 14.1.3 of Annex VI of the MARPOL Convention comes into effect, there are ...
Saturday, 13 October 18
SUPRAMAX: SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITY IN THE INDIAN OCEAN WAS EVIDENT AND RATES JUMPED - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
A sharp reversal of fortunes for the big ships as the week closed after a depressed beginning. To start with drops were sudden, with t ...
Wednesday, 10 October 18
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - ILIAS M. LALAOUNIS
During the end of last month the BHSI was hovering around 630 points, while the last observed sale on a 10-yr old Japanese Handy was the M/V Van Im ...
Monday, 08 October 18
INDONESIAN THERMAL COAL PRICE REFERENCE FELL 3.74% IN OCTOBER 2018
COALspot.com: The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Indonesia has revised down the benchmark price of Indonesian thermal ...
|
|
|
Showing 1591 to 1595 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Planning Commission, India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Australian Coal Association
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- VISA Power Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- PTC India Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
