We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 03 October 18
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - KATERINA RESTIS
The bunker fuel supply and availability landscape is close to its transformation with the enforcement of the IMO’s global 0.5% fuel Sulphur c ...
Tuesday, 02 October 18
PANAMAX: A FURTHER RISE ACROSS ALL MAIN ROUTES THIS WEEK - ALLIED
Capesize
Finally an upward recovery was in sight in the spot market the past few days, after the prolonged negative pressure noted the weeks pr ...
Tuesday, 02 October 18
THE PRICE OF OIL CONTINUES ITS CLIMB AMIDST A SERIES OF CONCERNS REGARDING SUPPLY CONSTRAINTS - GEORGE LAZARIDIS
It has been a busy week for oil traders as the price of oil continues its climb amidst a series of concerns regarding supply constraints.
...
Tuesday, 02 October 18
INDONESIA GETS READY TO MEET INCREASED COAL DEMAND FROM CHINA, FREIGHT TO RESPOND - MIKAL BOE
Indonesian coal suppliers have increased their domestic coal production target by 4.5 percent from a previous 485 million tonnes to a massive 507 m ...
Monday, 01 October 18
SUPRAMAX: A 56,000 DWT FIXED DELIVERY FOR A SURABAYA TRIP WITH REDELIVERY TO WEST COAST INDIA AT $13,500 - THE BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
A stop-start market for the big ships with many expectations and few fulfilled. Holidays curtailed trading early in the week, but the ...
|
|
|
Showing 1601 to 1605 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Planning Commission, India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- The University of Queensland
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
|
| |
| |
|