We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 24 October 18
MARKET INSIGHT - NASSOS SOULAKIS
Looking at 2018 SnP activity, it is evident that Greek, Chinese and North European (German and Norwegian) owners are the top buying nationalities, ...
Wednesday, 24 October 18
CHINESE POWER PLANT STOCKPILES AT HIGHEST LEVEL SINCE 2015 - JEFFREY LANDSBERG
Chinese power plant coal stockpiles have climbed to approximately 83.3 million tons as of the middle of this month, said Jeffrey Landsberg in his e ...
Tuesday, 23 October 18
WILL THE U.S. COAL DECLINE CONTINUE? - FORBES
What’s Trump’s new coal proposal?
Adding to its controversial plan to leverage federal authority to keep retiring baselo ...
Monday, 22 October 18
CONTINUED HIGH LNG PRICES; TRADE WAR IMPACT LIMITED - FITCH RATINGS
Fitch Ratings expects sustained high spot liquefied natural gas (LNG) and contract prices over the next two quarters on limited investment in LNG e ...
Monday, 22 October 18
WINTER OIL MARKET OUTLOOK - OPEC
The oil market in the winter season is generally characterized by demand for diesel, particularly in the northern hemisphere, leaving product marke ...
|
|
|
Showing 1581 to 1585 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Australian Coal Association
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- The University of Queensland
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- White Energy Company Limited
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Planning Commission, India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
|
| |
| |
|