We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 20 October 18
PANAMAX: THE PACIFIC SAW A LARGE VOLUME OF FIXING, WITH INDONESIA AGAIN THE DRIVING FORCE - THE BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
A positive end to last week after a shaky start, with a Coaltrans taking participants out of the market early on and with rates slippi ...
Thursday, 18 October 18
SUPRAMAX: INDO/WC INDIA SUPRAS ARE FIXING AROUND MID $14000S P/D BASIS SPORE DELIVERY
Capesize
The volatile Cape market continues this week, especially in the Pacific says Fearnleys in its latest weekly report.
...
Thursday, 18 October 18
COAL SHORTAGE HITS POWER SECTOR AGAIN; HOW INDIA CAN GET ITS PRODUCTION RIGHT - ANIL SWARUP
By convincing states of the value proposition of increased production, the record production of Fy15 & Fy16 can be emulated.
The ...
Thursday, 18 October 18
CHINA POWER REFORM NEUTRAL ON GRIDS, PRESSURES IPP MARGINS - FITCH RATINGS
China's power sector reform has a broadly neutral impact on transmission grids although it will pressure the power producers' margins, says ...
Wednesday, 17 October 18
ESCROW SERVICE FOR BALTIC MEMBERS NOW LIVE
The Baltic Exchange’s Escrow Service for its members to hold deposits for ship sale transactions goes live today (15 October). The service is ...
|
|
|
Showing 1586 to 1590 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- The University of Queensland
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Planning Commission, India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Australian Coal Association
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
