We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 08 October 18
KOMIPO INVITES BIDS FOR 520,000 TONS OF COLOMBIAN ORIGIN OF 5,700 NAR COAL
COALspot.com: South Korea state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued a tender for 520,000 MT of min. 5700 NAR coal of Colombian origin ...
Sunday, 07 October 18
SUPRAMAX: INDO-INDIA USUAL COAL RUNS WERE COVERED AT US$ 12K - FEARNLEYS
Capesize
Average daily earnings up close to 15 pct in 5 trading days, thus patience finally paying off for owners of the big ships - Chinese play ...
Sunday, 07 October 18
A CASE FOR 20/20 VISION? IMO'S LOW SULPHUR FUEL LIMIT UNDER MARPOL ANNEX VI WHICH COMES INTO FORCE ON 1ST JANUARY 2020
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The implementation of the global 0.5% sulphur cap for bunker fuel under MARPOL Annex VI in just under 18 months’ ti ...
Friday, 05 October 18
COAL PRODUCTION REACHES 64% OF 2018 TARGET : THE JAKARTA POST
National coal production up to August has already reached 311 million tons, or 64 percent of this year's total target of 485 million tons, acco ...
Wednesday, 03 October 18
VALUE OF AUSTRALIAN COAL EXPORTS TIPPED TO DECLINE SHARPLY OVER NEXT 18 MONTHS - THE GUARDIAN
Thermal coal prices forecast to drop 25% and metallurgical coal prices 23% as value of iron ore exports also falls
The value of Aust ...
|
|
|
Showing 1596 to 1600 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Planning Commission, India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
|
| |
| |
|
