We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 17 January 23
CHINA'S SHANXI TARGETS 2023 COAL PRODUCTION OF NEARLY 1.37B TONS - XINHUA
China’s coal-rich province of Shanxi has set a coal production target of nearly 1.37 billion metric tons for 2023, according to a government ...
Tuesday, 17 January 23
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Rumor has it that the New Year has come, to set the pace in, for Russia to continue hostilities against Ukraine. Ten months on the go, into Russia& ...
Tuesday, 17 January 23
INDONESIA IS ACCOUNTING FOR 32.3% OF THE GLOBAL SEABORNE COAL MARKET IN 2022 - BENCHERO COSTA
After a slow start in the first quarter, global coal trade has really picked up pace last year, and is now fully back to pre-Covid levels, Benchero ...
Tuesday, 10 January 23
INDONESIAN HBA IS SEEING A SPIKE IN JANUARY 2023 INSTEAD OF A SIGNIFICANT FALL IN DECEMBER 2022
COALspot.com: Indonesian Coal Price Reference up 8.43% in January 2023.
HBA is seeing a dramatic spike in January 2023 i ...
Sunday, 08 January 23
INDIAN COAL POWER PLANTS SHOULD BE COMPENSATED FOR 2022 FORCED GENERATION – REGULATOR : REUTERS
Indian power plants that rely on imported coal should be fully compensated when forced to supply electricity, the country’s power regulator s ...
|
|
|
Showing 151 to 155 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- The University of Queensland
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- White Energy Company Limited
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
