We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 18 February 23
PAKISTAN PLANS TO QUADRUPLE DOMESTIC COAL-FIRED POWER, MOVE AWAY FROM GAS - REUTERS
Pakistan plans to quadruple its domestic coal-fired capacity to reduce power generation costs and will not build new gas-fired plants in the coming ...
Saturday, 18 February 23
2023 MARINE FUEL MARKET PREDICTIONS - JOHN BERGMAN, AURAMARINE
The drive for decarbonisation we witnessed in 2022 has continued into 2023, demonstrating the shipping’s industry positive strides in the fas ...
Saturday, 28 January 23
COAL GROWTH BLIP NOT TO BE REPEATED - BALTIC EXCHANGE
As 2022 drew to a close, global coal demand looked set to end the year just 1.2% up on the previous year. But that small increase was enough to pus ...
Thursday, 26 January 23
CHINA'S COAL OUTPUT INCREASES IN DECEMBER 2022 - XINHUA
China’s raw coal output posted stable expansion in December 2022, official data showed.
The country produced 400 million tonne ...
Thursday, 26 January 23
COKING COAL NARROWS THE GAP ON THERMAL AS CHINA REOPENS - REUTERS
The premium of high-grade thermal coal over coking coal in Asia is shrinking as China’s re-opening and ending of a ban on imports from Austra ...
|
|
|
Showing 141 to 145 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- The University of Queensland
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Planning Commission, India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- PTC India Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Australian Coal Association
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
