We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 26 January 23
AUSTRALIA'S CORONADO GLOBAL SEES COAL PRICES RISING ON RESUMING CHINA IMPORTS - REUTERS
Australia’s Coronado Global Resources said on Tuesday resuming metallurgical coal imports to China would likely push sea-borne coal prices hi ...
Monday, 23 January 23
CHINA'S MAJOR COAL-PRODUCING PROVINCE ACCELERATES DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION - XINHUA
At Chindata Group’s big-data industrial park in Lingqiu County of Datong City, hundreds of thousands of servers are running round-the-clock t ...
Monday, 23 January 23
CHINA'S COAL-RICH PROVINCE SEES COAL PRODUCTION INCREASE IN 2022 - XINHUA
North China’s coal-rich province of Shanxi saw its coal production hit 1.31 billion tonnes in 2022, up 8.7 percent year on year, local author ...
Wednesday, 18 January 23
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
From Feb 5, another price cap will be introduced to Russian fuels and oil products, adding to the one for crude oil, already in place from Dec. 3. ...
Tuesday, 17 January 23
FRAUD IS THE BIGGEST THREAT TO CARGO LOSSES - TT CLUB
The almost exclusive use of online facilities to process business transactions allows a myriad of fraudulent pursuits to find opportunities within ...
|
|
|
Showing 146 to 150 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Australian Coal Association
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- White Energy Company Limited
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Planning Commission, India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
|
| |
| |
|
