We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 22 December 22
RUSSIAN OIL EXPORTS CRATER BY 54% IN THE FIRST FULL WEEK OF THE EU'S EMBARGO AMID A SHORTAGE OF TANKERS WILLING TO CARRY CARGOES - BUSINESS INSIDER
Since the European Union imposed its seaborne crude sanctions, Russian oil exports have tumbled by more than half, according to data compiled by Bl ...
Thursday, 22 December 22
CHINA TIGHTENS VERIFICATION OF SHIPS’ ENERGY CONSUMPTION DATA - GARD
From 22 December 2022, ships trading to Chinese ports must record their energy consumption data in accordance with the requirements of their Ship E ...
Thursday, 22 December 22
AN OVERVIEW OF THE LNG MARKET - VESSELSVALUE
LNG values have continued to strengthen, spurred by skyrocketing earnings that have surpassed last year’s record breaking peaks. In November, ...
Thursday, 22 December 22
COKING COAL SLUMPS AS TALKS ON AUSTRALIA-CHINA TRADE RIFT LOOM - REUTERS
Chinese coking coal futures dropped more than 3 per cent on Tuesday (Dec 20), extending losses, as supply of the steelmaking input might increase i ...
Thursday, 22 December 22
COAL AND GAS PRICE CAPS MAY COMPOUND POLITICAL RISK FOR AUSTRALIAN CORPORATES - FITCH RATINGS
Australia’s introduction of temporary price caps on domestic sales of gas and coal used for electricity generation will probably have limited ...
|
|
|
Showing 161 to 165 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PTC India Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
