We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 08 January 23
ELEVATED COAL PRICE A DRAG ON MARGINS OF DOMESTIC BASE METAL PLAYERS: ICRA
The increased price of coal continue to be a drag on the margin of domestic base metal players with no immediate relief in sight, rating agency ICR ...
Monday, 02 January 23
CHINA’S COAL CONSUMPTION TO PEAK BY 2035: REPORT - REUTERS
China’s primary energy consumption is likely to peak at nearly 6.03 billion tonnes of standard coal between 2030 and 2035, refining giant Chi ...
Thursday, 29 December 22
INDIA'S COAL DEMAND LIKELY TO PEAK BETWEEN 2030-2035: MINISTER - ANI
The demand for coal in India will continue and is likely to peak between 2030-2035, Union Minister of Coal, Mines, and Parliamentary Affairs Pralha ...
Thursday, 29 December 22
RIO TINTO AND PARTNERS COULD RECEIVE AS MUCH AS $450M IN GOVERNMENT COMPENSATION FOR COAL PRICE CAP - THE GUARDIAN
Compensation payments for the Gladstone power plant remain the sticking point in the federal government’s coal price cap compensation negotia ...
Wednesday, 28 December 22
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) published a Global Trade Update on December 13th highlighting that global trade wou ...
|
|
|
Showing 156 to 160 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- The University of Queensland
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Planning Commission, India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Australian Coal Association
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- PTC India Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
|
| |
| |
|
