We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 04 January 19
FOCUS IS ON BOOSTING COAL PRODUCTION: INDIAN COAL MINISTER
The current focus of the government is on boosting production from operational coal mines, according to Minister for Coal, Piyush Goyal.
...
Thursday, 03 January 19
CAPESIZE: A MORE POSITIVE START OF THE NEW YEAR THAN EXPECTED FOR THE BIG SHIPS - FEARNLEYS
Capesize
A more positive start of the new year than expected for the big ships, with average gains of US$ 500/day posted on the first tra ...
Tuesday, 01 January 19
INDONESIA: COAL PRODUCTION EXPECTED TO EXCEED THIS YEAR'S TARGET - JP
Indonesian coal production reached 456 million tons up to Thursday or 94.02 percent of this year’s total target of 485 million tons, accordin ...
Monday, 31 December 18
THE INDONESIAN COAL MARKET Q1 '19 FORECAST: LOOKS DIRECTIONLESS - TRADER
The Indonesian coal market looks directionless, an International coal trader said when we asked him to give his forecast for 1Q' 2019.
...
Monday, 31 December 18
GLOBAL COAL DEMAND GREW BY 1% IN 2017; GLOBAL COAL POWER GENERATION INCREASED BY OVER 250 TWH - IEA
After two years of decline, global coal demand grew by 1% in 2017 to 7585 Mt as stronger global economic growth increased both industrial output an ...
|
|
|
Showing 1506 to 1510 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Planning Commission, India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- The University of Queensland
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
